As Lebanon tests US-Iran deal, Trump must rein in Netanyahu, analysts say
It is not another anonymously sourced report about a rift between the United States and Israel. This time, the administration of President Donald Trump appears genuinely frustrated with Prime Minister
It is not another anonymously sourced report about a rift between the United States and Israel. This time, the administration of President Donald Trum
Read Full Story at Al Jazeera โThe escalating tension between Washington and Jerusalem over Lebanon underscores a critical inflection point in Middle East policyโone where strategic patience is fraying on both sides. For decades, the U.S. has balanced its alliance with Israel against its broader regional interests, often mediating crises to prevent wider destabilization. But with Lebanon now serving as a pressure test for the Trump administrationโs approach to Iran and its proxies, the stakes have never been higher. The Lebanese governmentโs tentative engagement with a potential U.S.-Iran deal signals a fragile moment of opportunity, but it also exposes the limits of American leverage when Israelโs military actions risk undermining diplomatic progress before it can take root. This dynamic is shaped by deeper, underreported realities. Israelโs military posture in Lebanon, particularly its strikes against Hezbollah, has long operated on the assumption that Washington will provide political coverโeven when such actions threaten to derail negotiations or provoke retaliation. Yet the Trump administrationโs apparent exasperation suggests a growing recognition that unchecked Israeli operations could sabotage its own efforts to stabilize the region through dรฉtente with Tehran. The White Houseโs frustration likely stems from the realization that Netanyahuโs government, emboldened by its backers in Congress and conservative media, may prioritize short-term security gains over long-term strategic alignment. What comes next hinges on whether Trump can assert control over a coalition that includes hawkish advisors, a resurgent Israeli right wing, and a Lebanese government caught between survival and subservience to Hezbollah. If Israel escalates its campaign in Lebanon, it risks triggering a broader conflict that could force Washingtonโs handโeither into deeper intervention or a public break with its closest ally. Conversely, if the administration succeeds in reining in Netanyahu, it may create space for Lebanon to navigate a perilous balancing act between Iranian-backed factions and Western-backed reforms. Either path carries risks: entrenching Hezbollahโs dominance or provoking a crisis that draws in global powers. The coming weeks will reveal whether this moment is a turning pointโor merely another chapter in the regionโs endless cycle of brinkmanship.
