‘I hate discussing Caitlin Clark’: Jemele Hill addresses current problems with covering WNBA

The first quarter of the 2026 WNBA season has been dominated by the discourse surrounding Indiana Fever superstar Caitlin Clark . Clark has had an up-and-down season, from a late scratch due to a back injury, to a glaring drop in scoring efficiency, to drilling game-winning three-pointers.

All in all, Clark and the Fever are 6-5 on the season, but with every game, the sky is either falling or Indiana is on a championship path. The discourse has led to a media environment that has exhausted one longtime staple in sports media.

“I hate discussing Caitlin Clark,” Jemele Hill wrote in a recent newsletter. “People are so overly-invested in her success and/or her failure that even the most reasonable critiques of her game are met with a level of vitriol that is alarming.”

Hill went on to implore readers to understand that her analysis of Clark is not rooted in any broad racial agenda.

“Unlike what some of her racist fans may think, my criticism of Clark is not rooted in a disdain for white people or some jealousy of white women. Some of them act like Clark is breaking a barrier as the first white girl in WNBA history… This idea that the league doesn’t accept white players is just a straight up lie. Ball is ball.”

Hill ended the Clark portion of her newsletter with an acknowledgment that it’s on Clark to determine where her career goes from here.

“She can’t win in the W like she won in Iowa. She can still be electrifying and a great player, but she’s got to be in better control of her emotions and look to contribute in other ways if her offense isn’t where it needs to be.

“Clark will be fine, but she’s now she’s being presented with a choice: Am I going to keep being BBQ chicken or am I going to start frying people?”