Over 60 Labour MPs urge government to reject Rosebank oil field project

Some Labour MPs are urging the government to reject the Rosebank oil field project off the Shetland coast, arguing it contradicts the UK's climate commitments. This push comes as a decision on whether to approve drilling is expected soon, with Prime Minister Andy Burnham indicating that a choice will be made "in due course." Energy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh has emphasized that her main concern is the affordability of energy bills.

The debate around Rosebank reflects a growing divide within the Labour Party. More than a dozen Labour MPs have voiced their opposition in Parliament, citing environmental concerns. They argue that approving the oil field would not only be harmful to the climate but also fail to deliver significant economic benefits. In contrast, some party members point to the potential for economic gains and the need to reduce reliance on oil imports from countries with higher emissions.

Amid these discussions, a letter opposing the Rosebank project has been organized by some Labour backbenchers. This letter, intended for Burnham, has garnered support from over 60 MPs. Critics, like Labour MP Abtisam Mohamed, argue that the project will not benefit taxpayers and will not enhance energy security, as much of the oil produced would be sold on international markets. They contend that the government's focus should be on addressing the cost-of-living crisis rather than increasing oil production.

The UK government has framed the decision on Rosebank as quasi-judicial, resting with Fahnbulleh. The Labour government, which has pledged not to issue new licenses for oil exploration, faces a complex situation. Licenses for Rosebank were granted by the previous Conservative administration but were deemed unlawful by a Scottish court last year. This ruling has left the current government with the responsibility to reassess the project, making the upcoming decision critical for both climate policy and the party's internal cohesion.