Rainbow warned its models that AI meant fewer jobs. Then their doppelgรคngers appeared.
The 90-year-old retailer Rainbow told its fashion models "fewer people will be needed" due to AI. The models say their likeness fueled AI lookalikes.
Business Insider Mkt โ 17 June 2026
Text:
5
0
0
The 90-year-old retailer Rainbow told its fashion models "fewer people will be needed" due to AI. The models say their likeness fueled AI lookalikes.
Read Full Story at Business Insider Mkt โ
โก Quickyla Analysis
Original editorial context โ not sourced from the article above
The warning from Rainbow to its models about AIโs threat to their careers wasnโt just another corporate memoโit was a stark admission of an industry-wide reckoning. For decades, fashion models have relied on their physical presence to secure lucrative contracts, but the rise of AI-generated doppelgรคngers has upended that equation. What makes Rainbowโs case particularly telling is how it exposes the tension between the human labor of modeling and the digital labor of replication. When a brand tells its workforce that fewer people will be needed, it isnโt just forecasting a shift; itโs signaling that the very idea of a "real" model may soon feel obsolete to employers.
This isnโt an isolated incident. The fashion industry has long been a proving ground for AIโs encroachment on human creativity, from algorithm-driven trend forecasting to virtual influencers with millions of followers. But Rainbowโs situation underscores a deeper ethical quandary: when companies use a modelโs likeness to train AI systems without compensation or consent, theyโre not just replacing jobsโtheyโre commodifying identity itself. The modelsโ claim that their likenesses fueled these AI replicas suggests a troubling pattern: the more a face is used in commercial contexts, the more it becomes a template for machines, eroding the exclusivity that once made those faces valuable.
What happens next is unclear. Will models push for legal protections against unauthorized digital replication, or will the industry double down on AI as the cheaper, more controllable alternative? The broader trend here is the acceleration of a gig economy where human labor is increasingly negotiable against the efficiency of machines. For workers in creative fields, the message is unsettling: your uniqueness is now a resource to be mined, repackaged, and deployed without you. The question isnโt just whether Rainbowโs models will find new opportunities, but whether the fashion worldโand society at largeโwill draw a line between innovation and exploitation before the last human faces fade from view.
Sources

