Radio
Now Playing
Quickyla Radio โ€” Click to play
Open โ†’
3 min left
Back to News

Rainbow warned its models that AI meant fewer jobs. Then their doppelgรคngers appeared.

The 90-year-old retailer Rainbow told its fashion models "fewer people will be needed" due to AI. The models say their likeness fueled AI lookalikes.

Rainbow warned its models that AI meant fewer jobs. Then their doppelgรคngers appeared.
Business Insider Mkt โ€” 17 June 2026
Text:
5 0 0

The 90-year-old retailer Rainbow told its fashion models "fewer people will be needed" due to AI. The models say their likeness fueled AI lookalikes.

Read Full Story at Business Insider Mkt โ†’
โšก Quickyla Analysis Original editorial context โ€” not sourced from the article above
The warning from Rainbow to its models about AIโ€™s threat to their careers wasnโ€™t just another corporate memoโ€”it was a stark admission of an industry-wide reckoning. For decades, fashion models have relied on their physical presence to secure lucrative contracts, but the rise of AI-generated doppelgรคngers has upended that equation. What makes Rainbowโ€™s case particularly telling is how it exposes the tension between the human labor of modeling and the digital labor of replication. When a brand tells its workforce that fewer people will be needed, it isnโ€™t just forecasting a shift; itโ€™s signaling that the very idea of a "real" model may soon feel obsolete to employers. This isnโ€™t an isolated incident. The fashion industry has long been a proving ground for AIโ€™s encroachment on human creativity, from algorithm-driven trend forecasting to virtual influencers with millions of followers. But Rainbowโ€™s situation underscores a deeper ethical quandary: when companies use a modelโ€™s likeness to train AI systems without compensation or consent, theyโ€™re not just replacing jobsโ€”theyโ€™re commodifying identity itself. The modelsโ€™ claim that their likenesses fueled these AI replicas suggests a troubling pattern: the more a face is used in commercial contexts, the more it becomes a template for machines, eroding the exclusivity that once made those faces valuable. What happens next is unclear. Will models push for legal protections against unauthorized digital replication, or will the industry double down on AI as the cheaper, more controllable alternative? The broader trend here is the acceleration of a gig economy where human labor is increasingly negotiable against the efficiency of machines. For workers in creative fields, the message is unsettling: your uniqueness is now a resource to be mined, repackaged, and deployed without you. The question isnโ€™t just whether Rainbowโ€™s models will find new opportunities, but whether the fashion worldโ€”and society at largeโ€”will draw a line between innovation and exploitation before the last human faces fade from view.
Advertisement
React:
Sponsored

More to Read

Sam Altman says OpenAI's top token spender uses 100 billionโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ“ˆ Markets & Finance
Sam Altman says OpenAI's top token spender uses 100 billion tokens a month โ€” and they're โ€ฆ
Business Insider Mkt ยท 21 days ago
Intel, AMD, Micron shares sink as Broadcom results spark seโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ“ˆ Markets & Finance
Intel, AMD, Micron shares sink as Broadcom results spark semiconductor sector sell-off
Yahoo Finance ยท 20 days ago
A new NJ bill would hand pet owners up to $900 in tax crediโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ“ˆ Markets & Finance
A new NJ bill would hand pet owners up to $900 in tax credits โ€” and your state could be nโ€ฆ
Yahoo Finance ยท 23 days ago
El Niรฑo Is Underway
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
El Niรฑo Is Underway
NASA ยท 6 days ago
'Astonishing': James Webb telescope spots the most chemicalโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ”ฌ Science
'Astonishing': James Webb telescope spots the most chemically primitive galaxy in the ancโ€ฆ
Live Science ยท 24 days ago
You can now beat ChatGPT Codex rate limits, if you have friโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ’ป Technology
You can now beat ChatGPT Codex rate limits, if you have friends
Android Authority ยท 12 days ago
Full view