Supreme Court rejects former FDIC member's claim for removal protections
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a former FDIC board member's claim for "judge-like" protections following her removal by President Trump in 2020. This decision upholds lower court rulings thaโฆ
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday refused to hear a challenge from a former Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation board member who said she was protected by โjudgeโlikeโ immunity after President Donald Trump removed her in 2020. The denial leaves in place a lowerโcourt ruling that the former directorโs claim of statutory protection was unfounded.
Trumpโs removal of the FDIC board member was part of a broader push to replace officials appointed by President Joe Biden with his own picks. The former director argued that, as an independentโagency official, she could only be removed for cause and that the presidentโs action violated the agencyโs statutory independence. A district court rejected that argument, and the appellate court affirmed, finding that the FDICโs governing statute does not give board members the same removal protections as judges.
Legal analysts say the
Read Full Story at Law & Crime โ


