Trump signs AI order requiring 30-day model reviews
Trumpโs executive order requires AI companies to submit new models for a 30-day government review before release, potentially delaying launches. It also prioritizes prosecuting AI-assisted cybercrimes, signaling stricter oversight.
President Donald Trump signed a new executive order on Tuesday requiring major AI companies to voluntarily submit new models for government review before public release, a move that could delay future model launches. The order, which replaces an earlier draft that sought up to 90 days of review, now calls for a shorter 30-day evaluation period. While participation is voluntary, the directive signals a push for tighter oversight of AI development, raising concerns among tech firms about potential slowdowns in innovation.
The order was signed privately, according to Politico, despite reports that Trump had planned a public event with Silicon Valley CEOs present. The shift suggests the administration may be recalibrating its approach after internal discussions about next steps. The executive order also directs the Department of Justice to prioritize cases involving AI-assisted hacking and unauthorized computer access, treating such crimes as high-priority offenses.
Industry observers warn that even voluntary reviews could create bottlenecks, especially if companies face pressure to comply. AI developers often race to deploy new models to stay competitive, and extended review periodsโeven short onesโcould disrupt that pace. The move aligns with broader global efforts to regulate AI, but it contrasts with the U.S.โs traditionally lighter-touch approach compared to stricter rules in the EU.
The orderโs focus on cybercrime reflects growing concerns about AIโs dual-use potential, where powerful tools can be exploited for malicious purposes. By signaling that AI-driven hacking will face aggressive prosecution, the administration is sending a clear message about enforcement priorities. The question now is howโor whetherโAI companies will adapt their release timelines to accommodate the new review process, and whether this sets a precedent for future regulation.
