Radio
Now Playing
Quickyla Radio โ€” Click to play
Open โ†’
3 min left
Back to News

US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on mail voting

The United States Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration caโ€ฆ

US Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on mail voting
Al Jazeera โ€” 24 August 2026
Text:
6 0 0

The United States Supreme Court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump to move ahead with his executive order restricting mail voting, though it remains unclear how much his administration can implement before the fast-approaching midterm elections in November.

The decision on Monday appears to leave room for additional court challenges that could further slow Trumpโ€™s order. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. The three liberal justices dissented from the decision.

The US Postal Service laid out how it would implement the orderย last week, but time is running short to impose major changes with some states beginning to send mail ballots to voters in just a few weeks.

Voting by mail has long been a favourite target for Trump, who has claimed that it breeds fraud despite strong evidence to the contrary and his own use of the voting method.

The case could be one of multiple voting-related challenges before the justices. The US Justice Department had filed an emergency appeal asking the high court to allow work on implementing the changes before the midterms.

Trumpโ€™s executive order, signed in March, calls on his administration to create lists of eligible voters and orders the US Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to people on those lists.

Democratic officials in 23 states and the District of Columbia sued to block the order. They argued that the US Constitution gives states and Congress the power to run elections, and Trumpโ€™s changes could lead to chaos and partisan abuse.

โ€œThe consequences of allowing such transformative changes to take effect so close to this fallโ€™s elections would be extreme,โ€ lawyers for the states wrote. Dozens of state and local election officials weighed in, asking the justices to leave the order frozen while election preparations are already underway.

Read Full Story at Al Jazeera โ†’
Advertisement
React:
Sources
Sponsored

More to Read

Russian strikes kill Ukrainian woman as NATO jet downs dronโ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Russian strikes kill Ukrainian woman as NATO jet downs drone over Romania
Al Jazeera ยท 8 days ago
Israeli settlers pitch tents for new illegal outpost in occโ€ฆ
๐ŸŒ World News
Israeli settlers pitch tents for new illegal outpost in occupied West Bank
Al Jazeera ยท 8 days ago
Oil prices, stocks surge as Hormuz closure drags on
๐ŸŒ World News
Oil prices, stocks surge as Hormuz closure drags on
Al Jazeera ยท 14 days ago
Iran voids 60-day nuclear negotiation deadline with US
๐ŸŒ World News
Iran voids 60-day nuclear negotiation deadline with US
France 24 ยท 6 days ago
Sanguinetti directs poetic debut on childhood in Argentina
๐ŸŽฌ Entertainment
Sanguinetti directs poetic debut on childhood in Argentina
Variety ยท 14 days ago
Idlib residents celebrate court's death sentence for Assad,โ€ฆ
โš”๏ธ War & Conflict
Idlib residents celebrate court's death sentence for Assad, former officials
Al Jazeera ยท 12 days ago
Full view